• Skip to main content
MENUCLOSE

Institute for Homiletics

A Collaboration of The Catholic Foundation and the University of Dallas

  • CONTACT US

Br. John R. Barker, OFM

Jan 12 2025

Scripture Study for

The reading from Ezekiel emphasizes that the divine will is for  the wicked to turn from sin and toward God. What God sees is the  direction in which one is currently headed, rather than where one  has been. This sounds good when we have turned from evil to good,  but the principle is less congenial when we have turned from good  to evil. In response to the accusation of unfairness, God notes that  what is in fact “unfair” is the human desire to have God always  forget past sin but never forget past virtue. God’s “fairness” consists in holding us responsible for the life we have chosen rather than the  one we have forsaken. 

We surmise from Paul’s letter to the Philippians that there were  divisions within the community, exacerbated by outside opposition.  So Paul strongly encourages unity: same mind, same love, united in  heart, thinking one thing. This unity is found by sharing the same  attitude that Christ had, which was sacrificial kenosis (“emptying”),  setting aside his own interests for those of others. The force of the  exhortation is sympathy or empathy, regarding others as “one with  oneself,” just as Christ united himself with humanity even to the  point of death. Just as there was in Christ no selfishness, no holding  back, no concern with “rights” or “prerogatives,” so it should be for the Philippians. 

The parable of the two sons presents a clear analogy: only those  who actually do the will of God, even if they refuse at first, will  enter the kingdom. The parable involves two sons, highlighting  the fact that even the tax collectors and prostitutes are children of  God—disobedient at first, and maybe for a long time, but children  nonetheless. The chief priests and the elders, who thought they were  following the will of God, were given the opportunity to reassess  that belief when John came preaching repentance. They refused to  listen to him, even when they observed the conversion of sinners at  his preaching. Those who thought they had no need to repent were  mistaken. 

Written by

Jan 12 2025

Scripture Study for

The reading from Isaiah suggests that even after the Babylonian  exile had ended, Israel (or some of it) still struggled to be faithful to  God. While there are no limits to the mercy of God, who is generous in  forgiving, that forgiveness must be sought through repentance. God does  respond to evil and one must not delay in repenting. Thus the insistence  that one must “seek the Lord while he may be found” (Isaiah 55:6). Yet  hope lies in the fact that God does not calculate forgiveness as we do.  As merciful as sinful human beings are capable of being, God is more  merciful. And in situations that human beings would find completely  unforgivable, God’s forgiveness for those who repent is unbounded. 

Paul is writing to the Philippians from prison, stating that his  imprisonment and suffering have “turned out rather to advance the  gospel” (1:12). His fervent hope is that no matter what happens,  Christ will continue to be glorified in him. He would like to die,  so that he can be with Christ (and end his suffering). On the other  hand, if he lives he will be able to spread the gospel, teach, and  support other Christians. He has learned to be content either way.  The exhortation to conduct themselves in a way worthy of the gospel  leads into the next section of the letter, in which he will address some  divisions within the community. 

Contemporary audiences of the parable of the workers sometimes  fail to notice that those who did not work until the end of the day  had not deliberately avoided labor; no one had hired them. All of the  workers in this parable lead a precarious existence, not knowing from  day to day if they will make any money to feed their families. The owner  of the vineyard, in paying all of the workers a day’s wage, is paying  them not according to how much they have worked, but according to  how much they need. The parable emphasizes the generosity of God’s  kingdom, in which everyone’s needs are met, regardless of their ability  or good fortune. God cares more about mercy than fairness.

Written by

Jan 12 2025

Scripture Study for

In a passage that mentions “sin” six times, Sirach focuses on refusal to forgive. Here the sinner is not so much the one who causes wrath and anger, as the one who “hugs them tight,” like a security  blanket; not the one who offends, but the one who avenges the offense. It is preposterous to hope to be forgiven for one’s own sins  if one is not willing to forgive others. It is presumptuous to expect  the sinless deity to forgive our sins when, as sinful human beings, we  are unwilling to do the same thing. Refusal to forgive is a form of hate, which is antithetical to the ethical perspective of the covenant  between God and Israel. 

Paul’s insistence that Christians live and die for the Lord  occurs within an exhortation against judging others. Those whose  consciences lead them to abstain from certain foods must not be  despised by those with different scruples, and vice versa. The point,  Paul says, is that each should be eating (or not eating) for the Lord.  If we are doing it for the Lord, and it is not evil, then it is good. In  fact, everything, even up to one’s own death, should be done for the  Lord. It is the Lord, he goes on to say, who will judge us. We will give  an account to the one for whom we have done everything, and that is the Lord, not each other. 

Immediately after Jesus gives instructions on the church’s proper  response to obstinate sinners (Matthew 18:15–20), Peter inquires  about the limits of forgiveness. Jesus’ answer—there are no limits— must have astounded those who thought that seven times was  already quite generous. The parable gives a straightforward rationale  for the demand that humans place no limits on their willingness to  forgive: because God places no limits on the divine willingness to  forgive. To act as if we have the right to limit forgiveness when we  ourselves must ask for it repeatedly constitutes gross hypocrisy and  ingratitude. We ourselves are the ones who place limits on God’s  forgiveness of us when we insist on placing limits on our forgiveness of others.

Written by

Jan 12 2025

Scripture Study for

Drawing on the analogy of a watchman, God reminds Ezekiel how  crucial his prophetic task is. If a sentinel sees an enemy advancing  against a city and warns the people, but they do nothing, the people  only have themselves to blame when they succumb to the enemy.  But if the sentinel fails to warn the people, when disaster strikes  he is guilty of a great crime. A crucial element of the analogy is the  correlation between physical death and the death of sin, which is  no less real for being “spiritual.” Not to warn the wicked of their  sinfulness is as disastrous a dereliction of duty as failing to warn  them of impending (but preventable) physical destruction. 

As he continues to exhort the Romans to conform themselves to  Christ rather than to the age, Paul focuses on the call to love as a  manifestation of the Christian’s conformity to Christ. A little earlier  in the letter, he had urged the Romans to avoid repaying evil with  evil, but instead to bless, live at peace, “conquer evil with good”  (12:21). Since loving others is the fulfillment of the law, which  the Christian must heed as the will of God, we are obliged to love  others—it is a debt we owe them. The earlier exhortation makes  clear that this “debt” extends even to those who persecute or harm  us; it is not an option. 

Jesus’ instructions make it clear that when the church must address  sin, it should be done in a way that minimizes publicity and shame.  The intention is to right the wrong, not to punish. The process thus  begins between the two individuals involved, expanding beyond  them only if necessary. Only those who, after repeated attempts,  refuse to listen should be treated “as a Gentile or tax collector,” in  other words, “excommunicated.” It’s helpful here to recall Jesus’  attitude toward Gentiles and tax collectors in this Gospel (9:10–11),  which is to invite them into the kingdom, suggesting that his desire  is that the “excommunication” be not only a last resort, but also not  the last word. 

Written by

Jan 12 2025

Scripture Study for

Jeremiah has struggled not only with the mission to proclaim God’s word, but also with the way God had gone about practically  coercing him into the task from the beginning (1:5). Jeremiah’s  attitude comes out most clearly in this famous passage in which he  accuses God of “duping” (or “seducing”) him. The prophet feels God  has put something over on him, and he has allowed it to happen. The  result has been nothing but pain. Yet Jeremiah is unable to simply  walk away. God has gotten into Jeremiah’s bones and the call to  proclaim God’s word is unrelenting. This is what Jeremiah was born  for and there is no walking away from it. 

Having concluded that no matter how mysterious are God’s ways, they are for the good of everyone, Paul turns to the response his audience should have to this divine mercy, which is to offer  themselves to God. This requires them to reject the tendency of the  “old self” (or the “flesh”) to conform to the values and expectations  of the world. Having died to sin in Christ, and with the Spirit dwelling  within them, they must be re-formed and have their minds, wills,  perspectives renewed. Being conformed to Christ means becoming  like him, who was devoted to nothing but the will of God, and thus sought always to do what God—not “the age”—considered good,  pleasing, and perfect. 

Immediately after being proclaimed the rock upon which Jesus  will build his church, Peter reveals the limits of his understanding of  the Christ. When Jesus announces that he will suffer and be killed,  Peter responds according to quite human ways of thinking: The  Messiah and Son of God could not possibly suffer and die. Jesus  immediately recognizes this reasoning as a satanic temptation to  abandon the course and insists that the kingdom of heaven is costly.  This is not a new teaching—Jesus has been proclaiming it along.  What is new is the realization that the Son of God himself will pay  the highest price. As he has previously assured them, the price will be worth it. They will gain the very thing they think they are losing,  and more.

Written by

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 35
  • Go to Next Page »

A Collaboration of
The Catholic Foundation
and the University of Dallas
Copyright 2026 | Institute for Homiletics
Designed by Fuzati

Connect with us!

We’d love to keep you updated with our latest news

We will not sell or share your information.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • News
  • Preaching Programs
  • Preaching Resources
  • Lilly Endowment Grant
  • Donate
  • Contact